[sigzero]

Because it isn't a "right" that is why. Once you go down that road it means that those that have have to pay for those that have not. No thank you.

[gbog]

I don't understand this logic. Maybe it's cultural. But still, freedom of speech is something like a human right, right? Then does it mean the government need to give newspapers for free to those who won't buy them?

Freedom to access internet is to same level, it means human people shouldn't be arbitrarily blocked from accessing internet, that's all, that's enough, and that's already a lot, actually.

[saraid216]

> Once you go down that road it means that those that have have to pay for those that have not.

I'm okay with those who have having to pay for those who have not.