Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wslh 592 days ago
The main point of the Nature article is, frankly, stupid. Imagine if a close friend or family member (brother/sister, child, mother, dather, etc) passed away when a cure was within reach, and your oncologist either lacked the insight or the ethical commitment to tell you.

In a conversation like this, I’d want to tag people who’ve lost loved ones to highlight the importance of ‘skin in the game.’ This issue isn’t abstract for those who’ve experienced loss firsthand.

1 comments

It was very odd reading an article where people were debating the ethics of a woman saving her own life, as if it was potentially a shameful act.