[exe34]

> if you are only making the argument you can detect true cases of LLM use without many false positives

this seems at odds with the ongoing issues at universities where professors blindly trust AI detectors that label their own work as AI generated. you'd think if it were that obvious, they would have high specificity.

with your dog example, children absolutely have to learn by checking with their parents - you show them a dog and teach them the word, they will apply it to cats and goats and you have to correct them.

you are like a child pointing at every animal and calling it a dog, but refusing to shift your position when your elders tell you no, that's a goat.