Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by o11c 592 days ago
.rar should be avoided since support in open-source extractors is rare (to my knowledge, the sole implementation comes from The-Unarchiver, `unar`). .7z is usually the way to go if not doing something fancy like casync.
1 comments

For compressing, but for uncompressing you can literally build unrar from source if you want, here's the source: https://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-7.1.1.tar.gz

I do want to point out that for transmitting compresed files 7z is fine, but as a longer term backup format rar has a lot of functionality that makes it convenient (built in verification, parity generation/repair, support for all the extended filesystem attributes)

That's not open source, only public source, which is a major limitation.
It's open source. Here's the license: https://github.com/pmachapman/unrar/blob/master/license.txt

(There is one single restriction added that you are not allowed to create a rar archiver with it, only a tool to handle existing rar files)

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?

A single restriction is enough to ruin everything.