[ImJamal]

Maybe I am missing something but Trump doesn't support much of that?

> nationalism, authoritarianism

Sure, you could say he supports this.

> anti-socialism

Not a fair right position. This I'd what anybody who is right of the center left position thinks.

> economic libertarianism

Trump doesn't support this. He wants all sorts of tariffs and the like.

> racial and gender hierarchies

I haven't seen any proof he supports such a thing.

> anti-establishment sentiments.

This is not a far right position. This is a populist position.

[cryptonym]

> tariffs and the like

Protectionism also is a value associated with "far-right". It may sound like it conflicts with libertarianism but in my understanding that's applied nationally, while closing borders.

I won't argue on positions of a specific candidate or party.

> This is not a far right position. This is a populist position.

Populism also is often associated with far-right.

[ImJamal]

> Protectionism also is a value associated with "far-right".

While it may be associated with the "far right", it is held by others as well. Many unions, in the past, supported protectionism for example.

Regardless, the argument was not about Trump holding protectionist views, but libertarian views which he clearly doesn't hold to.

> It may sound like it conflicts with libertarianism but in my understanding that's applied nationally, while closing borders.

Closing the borders has nothing to do with libertarian economics or protectionism.

If you go back 15 years ago plenty of people on the left supported restricting immigration. Bernie Sanders famously called open borders a Koch Brothers plan to get cheap labor and harm workers in the US.

> Populism also is often associated with far-right.

While most populist politicians, at the moment, are on the right, it is not a right wing position. Bernie Sanders is often referred to as a populist as well.

Regardless, it is not a far right position to be anti-establishment or whatever somebody defines populist as.

[cryptonym]

Sorry if that was not clear in my messages. It's not binary and exclusive. The values are commonly associated with far-right. That doesn't mean each value is exclusive to far-right. It doesn't mean a far-right party cannot deny part of them or accept any other values.

As with every definition there is a grey area and when a party is labelled as far-right it means that it ticks many boxes that put it in this category. Of course, people can disagree, argue on positions, that's politics.

> Closing the borders has nothing to do with libertarian economics or protectionism.

On that specific point, I was thinking about economical protectionism than physically closing border.

> populist [...] is not a right wing position.

True, it's usually associated with far-right or far-left rather than regular party.