|
|
|
|
|
by Rinzler89
591 days ago
|
|
>morally we absolutely are obliged to give them shelter. We'll have to agree to disagree. >most of the germans who are homeless failed to take advantage of available support to get it What if the system is poorly designed getting people slipping through the nets? I don't agree being so dismissive and throwing all the blame onto them. > it is a fallacy to think that refusing help to refugees would improve the situation for locals It's not a fallacy, it's basic economics. >this is the kind of rhetoric that stirs up xenophobia and plays into the hands of the kind of politicians that according to your last paragraph you also don't want to see elected. Then maybe the politicians should fucking listen for once and actually do what the people want them to do instead of doing something else and being shocked people don't like it. |
|
i am not, see my next sentence: "otherwise if they didn't get support then the problem is a failure in the bureaucracy, not a lack of available space or resources."
the point is, what ever the reason for being homeless, it is not because refugees took away resources.
do what the people want them to do instead of doing something else and being shocked people don't like it
but that doesn't work if the people are being misled about the cause of the problems they are facing.