|
|
|
|
|
by wg0
599 days ago
|
|
Linus being generous - it however is actually 99% marketing, one percent reality. - The text output generated by LLMs is immediately recognisable, is not reliable enough that you hand it over writing wikis on any legal, technical or financial aspect. - Code examples generated by LLMs CANNOT work without supervision and review of an experienced engineer. - Outputs of various image models and their generated artwork is immediately recognisable no matter if it is in YouTube thumbnails or blog posts. For any serious work, you need a human designer to design the marketing websites etc or you are guaranteed to be not taken seriously by anyone. Upside of this AI spring (after a long winter) are mostly in text to speech and speech to text which are not perfect but very useful in many domains. |
|
My experience as someone who also hates the hype cycle is that I forced myself to try it to generate code despite being deeply skeptical. I havent had a single good experience, meaning getting the code that does the thing I want.
I've also tried leetcode exercises and also failed here. And that's what surprised me the most - surely if anything it should be able to get right publicly available questions with publicly available solutions? I don't get it.
Once I asked it for a name of people, and I asked it to format it as an html table and it did that right which was nice...