Are others violating this law having such an outsized influence on U.S. politics? Here, you have an illegal immigrant who has built multiple companies on the backs of billions of dollars of taxpayer money and uses it to spread misinformation, and you don't see a problem with that? It's basically terrorism.
I'm no fan of Musk. However, building companies is generally considered to be a good thing. Doing it with taxpayer money is only bad if it's somehow fraudulent - if you make a company and get a government contract and you actually fulfill that contract, that's neutral or good.
Spreading misinformation is definitely bad, but I don't think I'd class it as terrorism.
Regardless, I don't see any chance of the US throwing Musk out.
He immigrated legally. The issue is that he did some work while he was on a student visa, which is a dumb minor technicality if it is even true. It’s not the outright illegal immigration that is enabled by one party, which is a far bigger influence on US politics.
> who has built multiple companies on the backs of billions of dollars of taxpayer money
Taxpayers got way more than they expected. Obviously.
> and uses it to spread misinformation
Musk has done more to restore free speech than anyone else in years and that is a threat to you. So now come labels like “misinformation”.
Calling that a border bill is a bit dishonest. It was a $118 billion bill with only $20B in funding for border security, with restrictions on immigration that wouldn't even trigger until 5000 people each day (i.e. most border crossers) had been processed the same way they are processed now.