Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by no_exit 597 days ago
You obviously didn't read the article, since the FOIA memo referenced was from that.
1 comments

The memo says:

"she knew of her husbands work, but that due to ill health she did not engage in the work herself."

As an accomplice, she might have deserved a lesser punishment, but she was not innocent.

Moreover, supposing that what the memo says was correct, she was willing to contribute actively, but her health had prevented that.