|
|
|
|
|
by dvqc
597 days ago
|
|
You have processes more formal and thorough than their code implementation? Really? At the end of the day, is it the cover-every-possible-bitflip-and-gamma-ray-bursts process that produces results out of thin air, or is it the machine running the code? I don't believe this is arguing in good faith. |
|
You seem to be making a logical fallacy to impute that it somehow must exist.
e.g. “ The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.”
Also why would any other reader, including me, care about beliefs about certain words more than the actual words?