[m463]

Kind of hard to tell, because sort of an optimal successful product is made from the worst possible hardware.

If you were to look at this in terms of a CPU chip, the cheapest chip would be the chip with the most defects that runs, while the chip with the fewest defects would be overpriced to sell, or extra-overpriced and overclocked to barely running.

Think about it - do you run out an buy a Xeon Gold blah blah for $15k or a core i7 for $200? Marketing keeps you from thinking the core i7 is "crappier and cheaper"

[rustcleaner]

This is why I prefer to underclock than overclock.