As a layman who has been following this topic for decades and has read many popularizations by leading physicists, and had a good undergraduate education in math and physics ... I have no clue how solid the charges are. My background on this is way too weak to justify holding an opinion. I generally don't hesitate in opining about things I'm mostly clueless about but in this case my ignorance is so vast that it is obvious even to me. If the greatest physicists can't agree on an abstruse physics topic I can't imagine what the opinion of a rando web dev might add.
That video in turn, has a great and extensive comment from @throwaway4179-s7d that raised Sabinne credibility, and actual decreases the one from Professor Dave Explains.
Not only of course, but I find is a good reference point, as somebody that was right in the middle of it, got out, and has nothing to loose saying what she thinks is true. She could very well be doing videos explaining all the models she does not believe, and have much more subscribers.
The question was to the person above where it seemed like that's what they were doing and then expected us to take their view as something worth considering. It was giving them an opportunity for them to explain their position and give themselves credibility.
Was I attacking Sabine or was I saying trusting a single source to inform the entirety of a view of a non-expert about a debatable topic is perhaps not responsible?