|
|
|
|
|
by johnnyanmac
588 days ago
|
|
These charts use "employment" in a very pedantic way. They don't look much at underemployment nor the shifts in proportions of salary ranges. I believe they also count gigs. So I could run Doordash for under minimum and be "employed" technically. The other dangerous thing is "averages". This is one of the special cases where you need to look at the lower quartiles. The average/median can look great, but if we have an entire quartile unable to pay rent we'd be in trouble as a whole. |
|
You can click through to the BLS survey to read more about their methodology, but the job growth number of +254k jobs in September only includes payroll employees. And reading the report would tell you that they do, in fact, track underemployment (people who worked part time but would have preferred full time employment). And neither job growth nor the unemployment rate has anything to do with “averages.”
Can you provide any data to refute the numbers I shared? Because again, the job market is looking pretty good to me.