[2924010774]

As someone who has a chronic illness myself, I think it's absolutely important to consider anxiety as a potential source. I'd much prefer if meditation or therapy would fix my health issues rather than something more expensive/annoying/side-effecting.

My complaint is that "this is caused by anxiety" is treated as an assumption, rather than as a potential cause to be investigated. Moreover, I've seen doctors use anxiety as a way to write-off and dismiss a patient ("it's all in your head" shouldn't be dismissive; it's still something that needs to be treated).

Sometimes a doctor might say, "why don't you try exercising three times a week for three weeks and tell me if that makes a difference," to test if that makes a difference. But I've never heard a doctor say "try meditating every day and then we'll see if that will stop your fainting episodes."

All that is to say, I wish doctors viewed anxiety as a cause to be investigated, rather than a dead end that they can use to ignore a patient.

[homefree]

Yeah I generally agree with that. The anxiety example comes from personal experience for me where I thought I was having some medical problem which ended up ultimately being fairly extreme anxiety. Learning how to cope with that was a form of treatment the medical system is ill-equipped to handle, but in my case had I gone down the path of "this is definitely a non-anxiety related illness" I would have been much worse off.

It's still genuinely hard for me to personally tell the difference and sometimes I think something is anxiety when it ends up being an actual virus (or the opposite).