Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hifromwork 589 days ago
But we're talking about writing laws here. For example:

>with only minimal requirements made of the driver.

could easily be changed by changing the requirements.

1 comments

No law is going to physically protect you from a 2 ton hunk of steel.
Not so sure about that one.

Commercial drivers are involved in collisions less frequently, and the more stringent licensing requirements (i.e. a law) are probably helping with that.

Drivers knowing that they will get away with mowing down a pedestrian so long as they say they didn't see them is also going to encourage dangerous driving.

Most importantly, laws that promote safer street designs make a massive difference in pedestrian fatalities.

All this to say that: laws do protect people from 2ton hunks of steel.

> Drivers knowing that they will get away with mowing down a pedestrian so long as they say they didn't see them is also going to encourage dangerous driving.

This is silly. Nobody thinks this. ”Mowing down a pedestrian”, even if one has a perfect legal defense, would be incredibly traumatic even for the driver. Traffic rules ought to be engineered with practicality (physics, the limits of human cognition and visual perception, etc.) paramount.