[heyjamesknight]

This is a joke, right? If a company is underperforming, then the underperformers are the first to go. Market economies require efficiency. Capital flows in the direction of success. Impeding this flow with regulation is a great way to create a malfunctioning economy.

[pixelatedindex]

I’ve seen instances where the people with the most seniority are let go first because they cost the company more.

[johnnyanmac]

Nope. it REALLY depends. Sometimes underperformers are focused on. Sometimes worst ratio of performance to pay is focused on. Sometimes it's random if lawsuits are a worry (AKA they want to layoff the older workers but need to shuffle in some others so it isn't suspicious). Sometimes it's purely vibes for who's picking who to be laid off.

There's no consistent layoff strategy. Especially not in times like this.

> Impeding this flow with regulation is a great way to create a malfunctioning economy.

yup, and look where we are heading next year...