|
|
|
|
|
|
by LeafItAlone
604 days ago
|
|
|
>Imagine the next 30 years when the majority of the population has no clue on how to function without cloud connected models answering questions on the daily. The basis of this argument has probably existed for as long as humans have been able to self reflect. If technology can very reliably do something I need to do better than I can do, why would I spend energy doing it myself. |
|
|
In reality, you're spending more energy. That being, yet, another problem with this use case [0].
Also, did it really "do it better"? Maybe it did it better than OP could, by their own admission. But they didn't learn anything in the process nor did they seem to consider the validity. Will it be right next time? How does one know? As indicated above - it doesn't appear to be a stretch that it could have just as easily given the wrong answer. [1]
"In an age of information, ignorance is a choice." — Donny Miller
[0] https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/projecting-the-electri... [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41997498