|
|
|
|
|
by throw10920
599 days ago
|
|
> And by and large, I suspect the insurance companies will be found to be at the root of it. At least in the US, this is true. The pervasiveness of interaction with insurance and the power they wield turns them into a rent-seeking layer with the massively negative economic effects of socialism. Insurance is meant to insure you against massive economic damage caused by unlikely events, like breaking your spine. It is not meant to be used for routine care appointments. It's meant to be risk-pooling, not cost-sharing. The very fact that you have to pull out your insurance card at a yearly doctor checkup should tell us that something is very wrong. |
|
The problem with this model is that often very catastrophic things can be caught during routine care, so it actually makes a lot of sense for insurance to pay for a yearly physical. Otherwise a lot of people are going to wait until their spine is blown out and their knees need replacement to seek any kind of care at all, at which point their care is 100x more expensive than if they did a yearly.
Any other kind of care like going to the doctor because you're sick is entirely the point of insurance. It covers your medical care for unanticipated problems.