|
|
|
|
|
|
by zimpenfish
598 days ago
|
|
|
Why not both? They solve different problems, after all. I'm currently using `litestream` for backups but I might add `sqlite3_rsync` as a point-in-time replica for things that benefit from "remote" sqlite access - easier than restoring a version from `litestream`, safer than copying it myself, and a lot easier than transporting changes over NATS / HTTP / whatnot. |
|
|