[surrealize]

Totally random, but I had a guess about the ts error. I hadn't seen kysely before, very cool!

  diff --git a/packages/lix-sdk/src/query-utilities/is-in-simulated-branch.ts b/packages/lix-sdk/src/query-utilities/is-in-simulated-branch.ts
  index 7d677477e..39502f245 100644
  --- a/packages/lix-sdk/src/query-utilities/is-in-simulated-branch.ts
  +++ b/packages/lix-sdk/src/query-utilities/is-in-simulated-branch.ts
  @@ -21,10 +21,9 @@ export function isInSimulatedCurrentBranch(
                // change is  not in a conflict
                eb("change.id", "not in", (subquery) =>
                        subquery.selectFrom("conflict").select("conflict.change_id").unionAll(
  -                             // @ts-expect-error - no idea why
                                subquery
                                        .selectFrom("conflict")
  -                                     .select("conflict.conflicting_change_id"),
  +                                     .select("conflict.conflicting_change_id as change_id"),
                        ),
                ),
                // change is in a conflict that has not been resolved

[samuelstros]

You are now forever in our git history https://github.com/opral/monorepo/commit/58734e11e51d8e20092.... the ts-expect-error was indeed fixed by your suggestion

[samuelstros]

Today i learned that HN has a nesting limit. @surrealize i fixed the username https://github.com/opral/monorepo/commit/7dc1f3c806bd89c6d68...

[aspenmayer]

The conversation in some aspect may have tripped the flamewar detection, which removes the reply button iirc. You can manually reply to a specific comment by clicking/tapping on on its timestamp.

[surrealize]

Haha, thanks!

[surrealize]

Cool! I'm surrealize though, sureglymop wrote a sibling comment! I should have just made a PR, lol.

[ec109685]

Isn’t kind just overriding the type checker? Should that as be necessary?

[surrealize]

In the context of the union query, I think it makes sense. The query takes two different columns (with two different names) from the same table, and combines them together into one column. The TS error happened because the column names didn't match between the two union inputs. But they would never match without the "as".

[samuelstros]

Yes. The runtime was not affected. Hence, the ts-expect-error. Still nice to have the ts-expect-error fixed :)