Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Lienetic 599 days ago
Can you explain further how you've come to the conclusion that "in the vast majority of cases there are objectively good and bad policies?"
1 comments

I believe it would be straightforward to determine policy if we had an oracle with perfect knowledge that operated under a so-called veil of ignorance [0]. Getting good outcomes with a fair & reasonable minimum standard of lifestyle for the people who are the worst off isn't particularly hard. The problem with implementing that system is the lack of oracles and deficits of intellectual honesty.

The key point is we don't need to vote to determine what works well. Whether a policy gets good results is just a fact regardless of whether or not people vote for it. And there are a large number of policies that were terrible the last time people tried them and will continue to be terrible even if the voting public decides to try them again.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance