[V-eHGsd_]

this reads like an LLM generated argument. it's totally incoherent and has almost nothing to do with what's being discussed.

cheers, friend.

[A4ET8a8uTh0]

Ahh, the llm defense.. I genuinely expected a little more. Shame.

[V-eHGsd_]

it's not a "defense". i'm saying your reply is weirdly bombastic and generally incoherent.

[A4ET8a8uTh0]

Stop. Own your approach. Good grief man, you act like your tactic is some sort of secret strategy, but it is obvious -- so why even try to deny it.

<< reply is weirdly bombastic and generally incoherent.

Bombast should not prevent you from being able to form an argument.

Incoherence would, but then it would make sense to point out something specific hang on. Otherwise, we are just putting random words together... you know.. like llm?

[V-eHGsd_]

it's not a defense because despite your efforts to antagonize, I don't need to defend myself.

i'm over our little interaction. cheers.

[A4ET8a8uTh0]

And yet you respond to tell me how you don't need to respond. I find the contradiction to be of note.