Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by myprotegeai 604 days ago
Yeah, what could go wrong with screwing with the neurochemical reward system of the entire population. Surely that will have no unintended side effects. It's literally a free lunch!
2 comments

what could go wrong with screwing with the neurochemical reward system of the entire population

We already know what can go wrong.

We already did that decades and decades ago. Sugar, for example. Aside from so many foods being laced with it, you can now simply walk into a store and buy a kilogram of sugar and eat it. So many other examples. That ship sailed a long long time ago. All we can do now is nudge the dial the other way.

Because you can buy sugar from the store, having the US subsidize ozempic for for the entire population makes logical sense. Got it.
That's not even close to what he said.

He's saying we already have completely fucked our reward system.

That's why 75%+ of American are literally eating themselves to death. And they can't stop. And no, "discipline" isn't a solution.

If anything, I'd say Ozempic brings our reward systems to be more in line with modern reality. Monkey brain doesn't work when you have the unhealthiest food available constantly at your finger tips.

Regardless of your stance on anything, it should be obvious we have a HUGE problem. I'm sorry, but a "do nothing and hope it works" approach is now off the table. We need real, tangible solutions. Not moral grandstanding.

Perhaps you could take your childishness elsewhere. It does grow tiring.
You are not the arbiter of what is "childish".

This style of condescension does grow tiring.

oh, so i guess you live outside and hunt animals for food? how's your all-natural neurochemical reward system?
If I'm not completely natural, then the entire population should have access to subsidized ozempic. Got it.
so you used the same logic that i made fun of in your post to make fun of the logic in your post... to say that my post was silly?
ie subsidized ozempic means everyone will use it?

You aren't making compelling points by pretending the OPs are stating things they are not.