|
|
|
|
|
by The_Colonel
607 days ago
|
|
That's likely a mistake in the article. "Small" black holes (i.e. smaller than supermassive) have star/stellar mass, but not size. Micro black holes are only hypothesized so far, but they could get very small - e.g. a black hole with Earth mass would have less than 1 centimeter in diameter. The size itself is not that important for spotting black holes, though. Even if it's as large as a star, all you see staring at the black hole "object" is nothing. What's important are the gravitational effects on the environment, and there the differences are stark. At a distance of 1000 light years, it will be difficult to spot a stellar-mass black hole floating through empty space, because its pull is strong enough only at stellar distances and won't produce enough disturbance in interstellar space for us to notice. OTOH supermassive blackholes will deform whole surrounding star systems because of its immense mass and gravitational pull. A micro black hole (e.g. Earth mass) passing through the solar systems would likely go undetected unless it collides with something (which is improbable). There could be a measurable disturbance, but it would be one-off and difficult to attribute to a black hole. |
|
Solar wind? Would it generate some interesting effects when coming too close to a black hole? All these protons accelerated to a near light speed, probably hitting each other and running away into a black hole.