[rlt]

Claim:

> Take a look at videos on YouTube by ThunderF00t. SpaceX is pretty problematic.

Response:

> Thunderf00t has basically 0 credibility when it comes to SpaceX. He predicted that starlink couldn't ever work, for example. In fact, he even thought that this landing would fail.

You’re claiming Thunderf00t is a good resource on SpaceX. The response gave examples of how he’s been consistently wrong.

That is not an ad hominem attack.

[sfblah]

Actually both the examples you cited are misrepresented. But whatever. You're in the cult. I get it.

[rlt]

And you’re in the other cult ¯\_(ツ)_/¯