[red_trumpet]

> you should be reasonable about it.

I don't get it. Shouldn't it be the seller's obligation to give a reasonable lifetime estimate? Like, give me a five year warranty, if you want to advertise your socks last for five years of regular use. Don't pretend it's unlimited when it isn't.

[ApolloFortyNine]

>Shouldn't it be the seller's obligation to give a reasonable lifetime estimate?

Not sure how you define this or maintain it. These socks are guaranteed for 100 wears? Can't count wears. These socks last a year. Is that daily wear? One of 10 pairs? Only air dried? Was the user running daily marathons?

You can extend this to pretty much every product.

>last for five years of regular use.

What's regular use?

[timnetworks]

buncha people caught wind and purchase the product used/torn for pennies on the dollar, and send it in, in order to take advantage of the offer (and the retailer).

[from-nibly]

Statement still stands. The company can't afford lifetime because of this possibility. They should change the terms. They could say single owner lifetime or something like that.