[nerdjon]

The argument around this that drives me the most insane, someone tried to argue with me that "how is this different than how we think" or "how do we know its different than us" or some variation of that.

As if because we can't prove it, it means that we should just assume it is doing something.

Then showing an example of it explaining a simple script as if that really proves anything.

The other one is "well humans make mistakes too". Well yes, but until now we generally expected that computers don't make mistakes or if they do there was something wrong with how it was coded. That assumption is now not only wrong, but we have to deal with the speed that AI can be wrong and how people are already comfortable with it manipulating data.