|
|
|
|
|
|
by seba_dos1
606 days ago
|
|
|
First you claimed that they "have very little in common", and now merely that it "is different"... although in the next sentence you go back to "clearly nothing like"?? You seem quite undecided about what you actually want to say. They're obviously "different", but there's plenty of reasons to believe that they have a lot in common, so going against established science should require some citations. |
|
|