[ETH_start]

The better solution is to continue respecting the First Amendment and not trying to restrict in any way, political speech, and instead reforming the electoral system so that the volume of speech one is able to output through the expenditure of financial resources does not have an impact on election outcomes.

[giantg2]

How so, and how is that different than my proposal in other comments?

[ETH_start]

Restricting political advertising to one platform would be a massive abrogation of the right to engage in political speech.

[giantg2]

The right as it is defined now, yes. The ability to restrict or redefine that right is still an option. See tobacco advertising and other harmful advertising that has been restricted.

Again, what are those electoral changes you believe will fix the issue?

[ETH_start]

So what I propose is completely different than what you're proposing, which is that you're proposing massively restricting the right to engage in political speech as we define it now.