| Just for an interesting comparison: Top 100 mining companies in the world: You'll note that even BHP only hits ~$200bil. http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page67?oid=95... These are companies that fundamentally provide the materials for our societies. Shall we change into energy? ExxonMobil is top, at roughly ~ $300bil http://www.platts.com/Top250Home This is a company that powers the modern world. ~ $6 bil for this, $8 bil for Skype, $100 bil for FB is nothing more than Peter-Pan land. aQuant was MS attempting to get Google to move on some issues, and an attempt to monetise chewing the cud.
Skype was MS attempting to control P-2-P interfacing - which will probably succeed (and wasn't ever designed to be monetised)
FaceBook was attempting to give the proles the same inherent networking architecture that the elites always enjoyed, and the $100bil is a pay-off for reshaping the world Hint: mining & energy deal in reality. Tech stocks deal in 'societal value' [where said value is not value to the consumer, it is value to the code controllers; "if you're not paying for it, you're the product"] and are largely to do with the cost of control. $6 bil in this case means nothing, because MS made billions from nothing. "It's worth a punt". Translation: if you spend $100 bil on liquidity per day, $6 bil is a joke. Remember: Gates has spent $18 billion on "African circumcision to prevent AIDS" already, and the US government spends that in a month on foreign military adventures (both aggressive and passive). ~ It was worth a punt. Google turned out to be aggressively competitive, however (and let's not mention the top three AI specialists who committed suicide in the year Google launched their algos... ok?) Be seeing you. |
What?