|
|
|
|
|
|
by TUSF
603 days ago
|
|
|
> What prevents anyone from dedicating a Zig memory allocator to the job (and all of its subtasks), and simply freeing the entire allocator at the end of the job? No baby-sitting needed. Given the whole ecosystem is built around the Allocator interface, it's entirely feasible for the consumer of a library to pass in a Garbage Collecting allocator, and let it do the job of deciding what gets dropped or not. Downside is that this is all at runtime, and you don't get the compile-time memory management that Rust has. |
|
|