|
|
|
|
|
|
by lysace
609 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, that seems like a very big hand-wavy assumption. This paragraph is quite...something: > Could you use other real-time distance measurements like laser rangefinding or visual processing? I don’t think so – the surface of the vehicle is too irregular to get a reliable fix point, especially while it is moving, and these are vulnerable to smoke/fog/gas/ambient lighting. Technologies like Ultra Wideband are vulnerable to multipath reflections and attenuation by the booster’s steel walls, and aren’t more accurate than RTK anyway. That is not exactly an exhaustive list of methods to locate an object. I have no idea whether 0.5 cm precision is feasible or even needed, but this part felt a bit off. |
|
|