[tsunamifury]

What? I’m sorry are you not on a public forum where people share their expertise?

I think maybe you could just reread this as you being informed by someone who worked on this for many many years at internet scale.

It’s ok to have less knowledge or be misinformed about something. We all are. It’s not ok to respond to that with insecurity and insults.

[epolanski]

I'm not insulting you, I'm merely stating you have an aggressive and patronizing attitude comment after comment which is a fact.

> I’m sorry to belabor this but you probably don’t know how growth and death cycles work.

> Sorry that’s just life.

> I think maybe you could just reread this as you being informed by someone who worked on this for many many years at internet scale. It’s ok to have less knowledge or be misinformed about something.

It's okay to share expertise, but this is better done with data (which you have provided none) and without that very sad aggressive attitude. "I know better, because I know and you don't" is no argument.

"The numbers for this and that huge blogging platform are down year after year" is an argument, yours isn't.

[tsunamifury]

You literally called me sad and pathetic. You’re either a bot with a bad context window or a young kid who is more than a bit lost here.

Just take a breath and read over this again. It’s better to learn from others than dig yourself in a hole of insecurity.

Also we don’t use data to proof text common knowledge in the field.

I don’t know what else to tell you other than your inexperience is showing and you’re angry about it

[epolanski]

I said you have a sad patronizing attitude.

You managed to twist it into calling you sad and pathetic and to add more of your sad and patronizing attitude in this comment.

Probably "experts" in the field like you have missed few days too much in elementary school when reading and text comprehension skills were taught.

Take care of yourself in your desperate quest for feeling superior over the internet.