[someluccc]

“As someone familiar with the aviation industry” you should know people “skiplagging” won’t check bags, which destroys your whole argument since that’s where all the inefficiencies lie.

Now you just have a no-show at the gate (P>50% ? something they’re surely used to handle efficiently) giving them some slack to fly their overbook flight without having to bump anyone. Truly a win-win

[Dalewyn]

>you should know people “skiplagging” won’t check bags

The point is that a no-show still causes hassle, and in this case hassle that didn't have to happen.

Shit happens, if you turn into a no-show due to factors outside your control nobody's gonna be angry. But if you are a deliberate no-show? All because you wanted to shave some cost? Sincerely fuck you.

>that’s where all the inefficiencies lie

No.

[CogitoCogito]

Airlines choose these ticketing policies and customers react to them rationally. If the airlines allowed customers to notify them that they won't be taking the final flight without any extra costs, then they wouldn't have to worry about no-shows like this (they could even resell the seat).

The airlines are choosing their pricing mechanisms and can live with the consequences.

[Dalewyn]

>customers react to them rationally

There is nothing rational about maliciously misleading someone in a business transaction.

>If the airlines allowed customers to notify them that they won't be taking the final flight without any extra costs,

You absolutely can: Just walk up to the nearest ticketing counter on your way out the airport and let them know you won't be flying. Simple, done. You might still get blacklisted, but you are presumably okay with the consequences.

[CogitoCogito]

> There is nothing rational about maliciously misleading someone in a business transaction.

Honestly at this point I think you're just being purposefully obtuse. Of course it's rational for customers to but a ticket A -> B -> C if they want to fly A -> B and the ticket A -> B -> C is cheaper than the ticket A -> B. What's irrational is for airlines to price their tickets that way.

> You absolutely can: Just walk up to the nearest ticketing counter on your way out the airport and let them know you won't be flying. Simple, done. You might still get blacklisted, but you are presumably okay with the consequences.

Once again you seem to just be willfully obtuse here. Being blacklisted is quite obviously a cost. Passengers being blacklisted means that _rational_ customers doing this won't tell the airline. If the airline didn't want passengers to skip the final leg of their flight without telling them, they could simply allow the customer to notify them without extra costs. They choose blacklisting (or charging to to "change" your ticket to not take the final flight) and this is the result.

I mean I get that you work in the airline industry and hence align your arguments to those that profit the airlines, but you really should accept that the airlines are knowingly creating this environment and that customers are just reacting exactly as you'd expect.

[Dalewyn]

>Of course it's rational

No, it is absolutely not.

Merchants can price their products however they want, and they have no obligation to sell to you. Customers can purchase a product if it suits them, including the price, and they have no obligation to buy from them.

The rational thing to do if buying a ticket from A to B is too expensive is to not buy it, let alone buy a ticket that flies to C.

>Being blacklisted is quite obviously a cost.

Don't break contracts you've signed if you don't want to get penalized.

>Passengers being blacklisted means that _rational_ customers doing this won't tell the airline.

Rational customers will tell the airline that their plans need changing/cancelling. This is just common decency as a human being, my dude.

>If the airline didn't want passengers to skip the final leg of their flight without telling them, they could simply allow the customer to notify them without extra costs. They choose blacklisting (or charging to to "change" your ticket to not take the final flight) and this is the result.

Sure, because airlines (and merchants overall) don't like it when customers try to change the deal on short or no notice. That said, if it's due to outside factors most airlines will try to accomodate you.

If you want to change the deal for unjustifiable personal reasons, of course you will get penalized.

>I mean I get that you work in the airline industry and hence align your arguments to those that profit the airlines,

I'm not, and I'm not sure where you drew that conclusion from. I am familiar with the aviation industry because I have family and friends who work(ed) in it (pilots, ATC, etc.) and I am a very frequent flyer myself.

>you really should accept that the airlines are knowingly creating this environment and that customers are just reacting exactly as you'd expect.

Most customers by and large are reasonable, they buy tickets that take them to their desired destination and the airline honors it. It's not a super power to be a decent human and conduct yourself professionally.

[cvalka]

They PAID for their tickets. They are under no obligation to consume the service they PAID for. What you are not willing to admit that the decent three don't do this stupid shit(Southwest, Alaska, Jetblue). The fucked up three are the ones pushing it: Delta, AA, United. I truly hope they go bankrupt.