Well that's the basis of my arguments. If you disagree on foundational definitions then we have a disagreement on language and our choice of what definition to use for what word is rather arbitrary. There's no way to conclude a discussion at this point.
Additionally if you actually follow the wiki definition above of "theoretical computer science" all of the contents of that article are literally describing mathematics and nothing else. EVEN the introduction says it's math. You haven't commented on this point.
Also It's not a "my definition" it's more of a definition within a well known body of study called the philosophy of science.
Additionally if you actually follow the wiki definition above of "theoretical computer science" all of the contents of that article are literally describing mathematics and nothing else. EVEN the introduction says it's math. You haven't commented on this point.
Also It's not a "my definition" it's more of a definition within a well known body of study called the philosophy of science.
Sources:
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Karl_Popper
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Falsifiability