|
|
|
|
|
by Tloewald
5095 days ago
|
|
It seems to me that the kicker is the obviously superior alternatives, such as python, ruby, and JavaScript, don't offer the ease of deployment that php has via mod_php, and instead insist on the developer writing a web server. While there are advantages (performance, control) to the web server approach it is clear that there are advantages (simplicty) to being able to stick code snippets in web pages. If you could deploy (say) python-decorated web pages via apache (on el cheapo hosting services) versus write yor own server and figure out how to host it then the problem would be solved. We have the languages, just not the ecosystems. Obviously I'm not the first to observe this. Mod_python exists, it's just not popular. |
|
Some of these servers are so easy to install and use, so much EASIER than Apache, that it really gets ridiculous to complain about.
mod_python has been deprecated for years in favor of mod_wsgi, which uses an actual standard. That you don't know this shows that the problem is too much documentation guiding people to things which are no longer modern or standard. If you use Apache, use mod_wsgi, it is infinitely better.
webfaction costs $5.50/mo, lets you do proper Python deploys rather than endless hacks and has good support, if you need cheap Python hosting.