|
|
|
|
|
by drostie
5105 days ago
|
|
Agreed. What they inherit from koans appears to be merely the violence that the koans take for granted.
My favorite example of this is the story of Gutei's Finger: It is said that Master Gutei would always raise a finger wisely when
teaching about Zen. Now in his monastery there were young boys studying
to be Zen masters themselves, and one boy, when he was asked questions
by his teachers, began also to raise his finger when answering Zen
questions. The teachers told Gutei about this and Gutei summoned him to
a rare audience with the master! Gutei asked him a simple question which
the boy could answer confidently, and the boy raised his finger as he
responded.
Gutei immediately grabbed the finger and in one motion cut it off with a
concealed knife. The boy screamed and ran to the far side of the room.
Gutei called him to stop and return, and the boy recovered his composure
and plodded back in front of the master. Gutei raised his own finger
before the boy, and in that moment the boy was enlightened.
Indeed, on his deathbed Gutei's last words were: "My teacher Tenryu
taught me the Zen in my finger, and though I used it my whole life, I
couldn't use it up."
I think the first thing anybody notices about this story is just the violence. When I told it to my brother he asked, "the lesson is, do not f--k with the Master?" But there is a deep set of Zen ideas -- lifting fingers which you do not have, and not getting attached to idiosyncrasy. Perhaps the boy even thought, "I should cut off the Master's finger," as he attained enlightenment. |
|