|
|
|
|
|
by mythz
613 days ago
|
|
If it were trivial you'd see LINQ-like providers implemented in "practically every high level language". Source code of the function means you have to implement the parser/lexer to convert it into a usable AST which is bad for both runtime performance and library size. Very much doubt this is available in Java, which Java ORM lets you use native Java language expression syntax to query a database? |
|
Not that I use this, I am a myBatis person in what concerns database access in Java, and Dapper in .NET for that matter, not a big ORM fan.
And case in point most people use LINQ for in-memory datastructures, not the database part.