[wakeupcall]

Also running FF with strict privacy settings and several blockers. The annoyances are constantly increasing. Cloudflare, captchas, "we think you're a bot", constantly recurring cookie popups and absurd requirements are making me hate most of the websites and services I hit nowdays.

I tried for a long time to get around it, but now when I hit a website like this just close the tab and don't bother anymore.

[afh1]

Same, but for VPN (either corporate or personal). Reddit blocks it completely, requires you to sign-in but even the sign-in page is "network restricted"; LinkedIn shows you a captcha but gives an error when submitting the result (several reports online); and overall a lot of 403's. All go magically away when turning off the VPN. Companies, specially adtechs like Reddit and LinkedIn, do NOT want you to browse privately, to the point they rather you don't use their website at all unless without a condom.

[acdha]

> Companies, specially adtechs like Reddit and LinkedIn, do NOT want you to browse privately, to the point they rather you don't use their website at all unless without a condom.

That’s true in some cases, I’m sure, but also remember that most site owners deal with lots of tedious abuse. For example, some people get really annoyed about Tor being blocked but for most sites Tor is a tiny fraction of total traffic but a fairly large percentage of the abuse probing for vulnerabilities, guessing passwords, spamming contact forms, etc. so while I sympathize for the legitimate users I also completely understand why a busy site operator is going to flip a switch making their log noise go down by a double-digit percentage.

[rolph]

funny thing, when FF is blocked i can get through with TOR.

[mmooss]

With what browser? The same one that's blocked?

[Adachi91]

> Reddit blocks it completely, requires you to sign-in but even the sign-in page is "network restricted";

I've been creating accounts every time I need to visit Reddit now to read a thread about [insert subject]. They do not validate E-Mail, so I just use `[e-mail]`, whatever random username it suggests, and `example` as a password. I've created at least a thousand accounts at this point.

Malicious Compliance, until they disable this last effort at accessing their content.

[zargon]

They verify signup emails now. At least for me.

[hombre_fatal]

Most subreddits worth posting on usually have a minimum account age + minimum account karma. I've found it annoying to register new accounts too often.

[immibis]

I've created a few thousand accounts through a VPN (random node per account). After doing that, I found out Reddit accounts created through VPNs are automatically shadow banned the second time they comment (I think the first is also shadow deleted in some way). But they allow you to browse from a shadow banned account just fine.

[anthk]

For Reddit I just use it r/o under gopher://gopherddit.com

A good client it's either Lagrange (multiplatform), the old Lynx or Dillo with the Gopher plugin.

[appendix-rock]

I don’t follow the logic here. There seems to be an implication of ulterior motive but I’m not seeing what it is. What aspect of ‘privacy’ offered by a VPN do you think that Reddit / LinkedIn are incentivised to bypass? From a privacy POV, your VPN is doing nothing to them, because your IP address means very little to them from a tracking POV. This is just FUD perpetuated by VPN advertising.

However, the undeniable reality is that accessing the website with a non-residential IP is a very, very strong indicator of sinister behaviour. Anyone that’s been in a position to operate one of these services will tell you that. For every…let’s call them ‘privacy-conscious’ user, there are 10 (or more) nefarious actors that present largely the same way. It’s easy to forget this as a user.

I’m all but certain that if Reddit or LinkedIn could differentiate, they would. But they can’t. That’s kinda the whole point.

[bo1024]

Not following what could be sinister about a GET request to a public website.

> From a privacy POV, your VPN is doing nothing to them, because your IP address means very little to them from a tracking POV.

I disagree. (1) Since I have javascript disabled, IP address is generally their next best thing to go on. (2) I don't want to give them IP address to correlate with the other data they have on me, because if they sell that data, now someone else who only has my IP address suddenly can get a bunch of other stuff with it too.

[hombre_fatal]

At the very least, they're wasting bandwidth to a (likely) low quality connection.

But anyone making malicious POST requests, like spamming chatGPT comments, first makes GET requests to load the submission and find comments to reply to. If they think you're a low quality user, I don't see why they'd bother just locking down POSTs.

[zahllos]

SQL injection?

Get parameters can be abused like any parameter. This could be sql, could be directory traversal attempts, brute force username attempts, you name it.

[kam]

If your site is vulnerable to SQL injection, you need to fix that, not pretend Cloudflare will save you.

[zahllos]

Obviously. But I was responding to "what is sinister about a GET request". To put it a slightly different way, it does not matter so much whether the request is a read or a write. For example DNS amplfication attacks work by asking a DNS server (read) for a much larger record than the request packet requires, and faking the request IP to match the victim. That's not even a connection the victim initiated, but that packet still travels along the network path. In fact, if it crashes a switch or something along the way, that's just as good from the point of view of the attacker, maybe even better as it will have more impact.

I am absolutely not a fan of all these "are you human?" checks at all, doubly so when ad-blockers trigger them. I think there are very legitimate reasons for wanting to access certain sites without being tracked - anything related to health is an example.

Maybe I should have made a more substantive comment, but I don't believe this is as simple a problem as reducing it to request types.

[homebrewer]

It's equally easy to forget about users from countries with way less freedom of speech and information sharing than in Western rich societies. These anti-abuse measures have made it much more difficult to access information blocked by my internet provider during the last few years. I'm relatively competent and can find ways around it, but my friends and relatives who pursue other career choices simply don't bother anymore.

Telegram channels have been a good alternative, but even that is going downhill thanks to French authorities.

Cloudflare and Google also often treat us like bots (endless captchas, etc) which makes it even more difficult.

[afh1]

IP address is a fingerprint to be shared with third parties, of course it's relevant. It's not ulterior motive, it's explicit, it's not caring about your traffic because you're not good product. They can and do differentiate by requiring a sign-in. They just don't care enough to make it actually work. Because they are adtechs and not interested in you as a user.

[miki123211]

> For every…let’s call them ‘privacy-conscious’ user, there are 10 (or more) nefarious actors that present largely the same way.

And each one of these could potentially create thousands of accounts, and do 100x as many requests as a normal user would.

Even if only 1% of the people using your service are fraudsters, a normal user has at most a few accounts, while fraudsters may try to create thousands per day. This means that e.g. 90% of your signups are fraudulent, despite the population of fraudsters being extremely small.

[ruszki]

Was anybody stopped to do nefarious actions by these annoyances?

It's like at my current and previous companies. They make a lot of security restrictions. The problem is, if somebody wants to get data out, they can get out anytime (or in). Security department says that it's against "accidental" leaks. I'm still waiting a single instance when they caught an "accidental" leak, and they are just not introducing extra steps, when at the end I achieve the exact same thing. Even when I caused a real potential leak, nobody stopped me to do it. The only reason why they have these security services/apps is to push responsibility to other companies.

[anilakar]

Heck, I cannot even pass ReCAPTCHA nowadays. No amount of clicking buses, bicycles, motorcycles, traffic lights, stairs, crosswalks, bridges and fire hydrants will suffice. The audio transcript feature is the only way to get past a prompt.

[josteink]

Just a heads up that this is how Google treat connections it suspects to originate from bots. Silently keeping you in an endless loop promising reward if you can complete it correctly.

I discovered this when I set up IPv6 using hurricane electric as a tunnel broker for IPv6 connectivity.

Seemingly Google has all HEnet IPv6tunnel subnets listed for such behaviour without it being documented anywhere. It was extremely annoying until I figured out what was going on.

[n4r9]

> Silently keeping you in an endless loop promising reward if you can complete it correctly.

Sounds suspiciously like how product managers talk to developers as well.

[anilakar]

Sadly my biggest crime is running Firefox with default privacy settings and uBlock Origin installed. No VPNs or IPv6 tunnels, no Tor traffic whatsoever, no Google search history poisoning plugins.

If only there was a law that allowed one to be excluded from automatic behavior profiling...

[marssaxman]

There's a pho restaurant near where I work which wants you to scan a QR code at the table, then order and pay through their website instead of talking to a person. In three visits, I have not once managed to get past their captcha!

(The actual process at this restaurant is to sit down, fuss with your phone a bit, then get up like you're about to leave; someone will arrive promptly to take your order.)

[eddythompson80]

I’ve only seen that at Asian restaurants near a university in my city. When I asked I was told that this is a common way in China and they get a lot of international students who prefer/expect it that way.

[Terr_]

The worst part is that a lot of it is mysteriously capricious with no recourse.

Like, you visit Site A too often while blocking some javascript, and now Site B doesn't work for no apparent reason, and there's no resolution path. Worse, the bad information may become permanent if an owner uses it to taint your account, again with no clear reason or appeal.

I suspect Reddit effectively killed my 10+ year account (appeal granted, but somehow still shadowbanned) because I once used the "wrong" public wifi to access it.

[lioeters]

Same here. I occasionally encounter websites that won't work with ad blockers, sometimes with Cloudflare involved, and I don't even bother with those sites anymore. Same with sites that display a cookie "consent" form without an option to not accept. I reject the entire site.

Site owners probably don't even see these bounced visits, and it's such a tiny percentage of visitors who do this that it won't make a difference. Meh, it's just another annoyance to be able to use the web on our own terms.

[capitainenemo]

It's a tiny percentage of visitors, but a tech savvy one, and depending on your website, they could be a higher than average percentage of useful users or product purchasers. The impact could be disproportionate. What's frustrating is many websites don't even realise it is happening because the reporting from the intermediate (Cloudflare say) is inaccurate or incorrectly represents how it works. Fingerprinting has become integral to bot "protection". It's also frustrating when people think this can be drop in, and put it in front of APIs that are completely incapable of handling the challenge with no special casing (encountered on FedEx, GoFundMe), much like the RSS reader problem.

[orbisvicis]

I have to solve captchas for Amazon while logged into my Amazon account.

[m463]

at one point I couldn't access amazon at night.

I would get different captcha, one convoluted that wouldn't even load the required images.

And I would get the oops sorry dog page for everything.

I finally contacted amazon, gave them my (static) ip address and it was good.

In other locations, I have to solve a 6-distorted-letter captcha to log in, but that's the extent of it.

[tenken]

Why?! ... I've had 404 pages on Amazon, but never a captcha...

[doctor_radium]

Hey, same here! For better or worse, I use Opera Mini for much of my mobile browsing, and it fares far worse than Firefox with uBlock Origin and ResistFingerprinting. I complained about this roughly a year ago on a similar HN thread, on which a Cloudflare rep also participated. Since then something changed, but both sides being black boxes, I can't tell if Cloudflare is wising up or Mini has stepped up. I still get the same challenge pages, but Mini gets through them automatically now, more often than not.

But not always. My most recent stumbling block is https://www.napaonline.com. Guess I'm buying oxygen sensors somewhere else.

[SoftTalker]

Same. If a site doesn't want me there, fine. There's no website that's so crucial to my life that I will go through those kinds of contortions to access it.

[JohnFen]

> when I hit a website like this just close the tab and don't bother anymore.

Yeah, that's my solution as well. I take those annoyances as the website telling me that they don't want me there, so I grant them their wish.

[immibis]

That's fine. You were an obstacle to their revenue gathering anyway.

[amanda99]

Yes and the most infuriating thing is the "we need to verify the security of your connection" text.