[jmull]

> Editors of the page appear to be non-experts in the field and biased against me personally for unknown reasons.

They are likely non-experts in measuring mountains, but may be experts in updating wikipedia.

While it's always possible they hold some unreasonable grudge, it's also possible this new data hasn't yet met the criteria wikipedia has.

This data is so new, you might just want to wait a while (especially before throwing personal accusations). Rainier will still be there.

[sparky_z]

You're the second person to quote that sentence, but it isn't visible at the linked page. Has it been edited out of the article?

[jmull]

Yes, it looks like it has been removed.

A good edit, IMO.