|
|
|
|
|
by troyvit
616 days ago
|
|
Those are good points. If FF can diversify the sovereign funds its tied to then it can cancel out some of the problems. I knew where you were coming from re: fully free software. My concern was more how its sovereign donors could influence that. I didn't know about Naenara. Checking it out. And yeah I agree about gov't support for journalism, but in the case of NPR (I work for one of their member stations), when large entities like X decide to label them "Government Sponsored" or whatever it indicates that there are some who see a conflict of interest. That could carry over to browsers. |
|
If that's a conflict of issue, then having a paltry 40 sovereign funds would also be an issue.
It's also blowing smoke, as a single man, Murdoch, owns hundreds of local, national, and international publishing outlets, but the single owner of an entity which is too small to be considered a DMA gateway doesn't care about the details.