|
|
|
|
|
|
by hobs
613 days ago
|
|
|
As a custom tool built to archive stuff for archive.org, why would you expect that it can also do a completely opposite task, saving information privately? I can see why you would want such a tool, but it seems like a direct divergence from the core goal of the existing codebase. |
|
|
Archivebox has no association with archive.org. Sending URLs to archive.org is just one of its features, which can also be turned off.