The web server of the nas is exposed to the Internet (port forwarding of 80 from the router to the nas); the rest of the nas is not exposed / not accessible from outside the LAN.
The images that are published are low-res versions copied to a directory on a partition accessible to the web server.
This is not the safest solution, as it does punch a hole in the lan... It's kind of an experiment... We'll see how it goes.
I'm aware they wrap OSS, but they made it very, very easy to adopt and maintain for a large chunk of potential users. This requires significant effort and should not be undervalued, in my opinion.
exactly, which means setting up a vps, generating certificates, setting up some type of monitoring to make sure the tunnel is working, etc. I agree that wireguard is the best option, if you have the time and knowledge, but for some dev people that just wants to put up a webpage with a few users, tailscale/cloudflare is a much easier system to maintain (especially as it handles ssl for you as well - to some degree...).
The images that are published are low-res versions copied to a directory on a partition accessible to the web server.
This is not the safest solution, as it does punch a hole in the lan... It's kind of an experiment... We'll see how it goes.