|
|
|
|
|
by makmanalp
606 days ago
|
|
If you like this, you might enjoy: "Column-Stores vs. Row-Stores: How Different Are They Really?" > The elevator pitch behind this performance difference is
> straightforward: column-stores are more I/O efficient for read-only
> queries since they only have to read from disk (or from memory)
> those attributes accessed by a query. > This simplistic view leads to the assumption that one can ob-
> tain the performance benefits of a column-store using a row-store:
> either by vertically partitioning the schema, or by indexing every
column so that columns can be accessed independently. In this pa-
> per, we demonstrate that this assumption is false. https://faculty.cc.gatech.edu/~jarulraj/courses/4420-s19/pap... |
|