|
|
|
|
|
by consteval
618 days ago
|
|
Because there aren't actually two sides to this, because even an anti-abortion stance doesn't save lives in the long run. Also, yeah duh Doctors are scared. That's called a "chilling effect", and it's 100% intentional by the legislature. Most "pro-life" politicians are completely anti-abortion, including in extreme cases such as rape. They're also almost always anti-contraception, which is hypocritical but also obvious. |
|
No really there is just two sides, wanting to kill an unborn child and wanting to protect it.
> Also, yeah duh Doctors are scared. That's called a "chilling effect", and it's 100% intentional by the legislature.
You missed the point. Given the laws they were authorized to perform an abortion. They chose not to do it to make a point. If they were honoring their oath they’d do what’s necessary and be judged later as their oath requires.
> Most "pro-life" politicians are completely anti-abortion, including in extreme cases such as rape.
All are. How about we solve rape instead of using it as an excuse to kill unborn children?
> They're also almost always anti-contraception, which is hypocritical but also obvious.
Citations needed. Some are sure, but you’re conflating an anti abortion stance with religion which is flawed.