|
|
|
|
|
by xracy
617 days ago
|
|
> it's not $400 There's just no point in having this conversation, and I'd like you to understand why from my first comment. You're not having a conversation about facts. Your sources for this information have been: 1. Claiming that what the article says is wrong.
2. Tweets with no primary sources This kind of stuff is really easy to find meaningful answers to, and you just don't and instead gainsay whatever goes against statements made by Elon. (Elon is not a reliable source for a reason). "Starlink is providing free service for 30 days in regions affected by Hurricane Helene" <- This is meaningfully false if you have to buy the hardware to access it. $400 is $400 more than free. |
|
Do they have to give out free cars, generators or gas stoves for it to be legit for you? Free Jerry Cans? Gas Cylinders?
I know how starlink works. I don't need to ask people on the Internet or read articles. I know at least two network engineers there from a mailing list I was on before they joined SpaceX . And I contacted one I saw on TV. I also have correspondence with researchers who reveal non public information about it.
Free service is meaningful even if you have to buy a private jet to use it. Apple's SOS is free and Google's SOS is free to the user.
So is Starlink service in hurricane areas.
Having to buy a device doesn't negate anything.
If I give out free WiFi I'm not beholden to give people free devices to connect to it either.
The truth is even if the device was free with one month of free service, it would just change what you complain about. For some people nothing is ever enough.