Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by keybored 619 days ago
If I really care about the version control history? Yeah.

Alternatively I could stick with git(1) which does all of this stuff out of the box. Instead of having to learn a superflouous (for the job) API.
1 comments
skydhash 619 days ago
I mean the PR data. The main advantage of a forge like Github are being web browseable, working great as a backup, and the PRs (and other stuff like artifacts storage and CI). All of these have alternatives and are optional. And the API is comprehensive enough to not feel locked in.
link
keybored 619 days ago
And I mean the “squashed” history. Because that’s what this subthread is about: the claim that it is available in GitHub so therefore it is fine.

I want the meaningful commits to be in the Git history. Because that’s a better place than the forge.

link
skydhash 619 days ago
When creating a squashed merge from the PR, it presents an interface for the commit message. You can put the information you want there.

It’s not a requirement. I wrote in another thread[0] why I like this methodology, but to each project its own.

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41839282

link
keybored 619 days ago
I know that you can write information in the commit message.

That is not sufficient. Which I explained here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41839438

link