With Git you can work in, well, at least twelve different ways. But people discuss workflows with some built-in assumption that of course everyone else is using it like they are.
That's the point. This is not your individual repo[*]. This is a collaborative repo where different people contribute to it. It's a good thing that for each repo we standardize on the tooling and process. The individual's preferences are strictly subordinate to the team policy. And when something is team policy it is reasonable to assume that everyone indeed works the same way as they do.
FWIW for individual repos I don't even use PRs so the whole issue of how to merge them is moot.
> That's the point. This is not your individual repo
The point? You’re not making sense.
This is a discussion. This is not your team pow-wow where the boss makes a show of hearing everyone out and then going with what he decided with beforehand. Or whatever your process is.
This right here is a discussion. It makes no sense to pull the “we all wear leotards because that’s the team policy”. That’s not an argument that I can recognize.
You should, in a discussion, make where you come from clear. If three comments in on the topic of X you say “but of course we use Y, how dare you suggest something else than Y?” then you’re not having an argument any more.
With Git you can work in, well, at least twelve different ways. But people discuss workflows with some built-in assumption that of course everyone else is using it like they are.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41839378