Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
nsnshsuejeb
621 days ago
No need. Just convince the king (e.g. Google for HTTP) to make a tweak in the next standard version.
1 comments
vitus
621 days ago
Good news! Both HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 use a packed binary representation for headers, so CRLF is nowhere to be found in RFC 9113 / 9114.
I don't see value in picking on Google or HTTP here, even if it is fashionable to do so.
link
I don't see value in picking on Google or HTTP here, even if it is fashionable to do so.