[Ekaros]

I think I can offer most reasonable compromise here. Decide upon on new UTF-8 code point. Have the use mandated and ignore and ban all end-points that do not use this code-point instead of CRLF or just LF alone.

[bear8642]

> Decide upon on new UTF-8 code point.

Unicode have already done so - (NEL) https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+0085

[phkahler]

So break everything.

[nycdotnet]

Which would need to be encoded in at least two bytes at which point, why not just use CRLF?

[kps]

You mean U+2028 LINE SEPARATOR?

[Ekaros]

Perfect. So now we just need to start filing bug reports to any tool that does not support it instead of CRLF or LF alone.

[bear8642]

Oh, yet another option - first thought was U+0085 NEXT LINE as above

[whizzter]

https://xkcd.com/927/